539 | 1 | 260 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:观察浮针治疗非急性期特发性面神经麻痹的临床疗效及对血清一氧化氮(NO)、内皮素(ET含量的影响。方法:将76例非急性期特发性面神经麻痹患者随机分为观察组(38例,脱落2例)和对照组(38例,脱落2例)。对照组予基础治疗(口服甲钴胺片、特定电磁波谱照射、面肌康复训练),观察组在对照组的基础上予浮针治疗,进针点包括肱桡肌、胸锁乳突肌、斜方肌等,于患肌周边进针,扫散同时配合再灌注活动,隔日1次,每周3次。两组均治疗4周。分别于治疗前及治疗2、4周后观察两组患者House-Brackmann(H-B)分级、H-B症状评分,比较两组患者治疗前、治疗4周后面部残疾指数(FDI)评分[包括躯体功能(FDIP)评分和社会生活功能(FDIS)评分]及血清NO、ET含量,并比较两组患者临床疗效和安全性。结果:治疗2、4周后,两组患者H-B分级较治疗前降低、H-B症状评分较治疗前升高(P<0.001,P<0.05),且观察组H-B分级低于对照组、H-B症状评分高于对照组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。治疗4周后,两组患者FDIP评分均较治疗前升高、FDIS评分均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),且观察组FDIP评分高于对照组、FDIS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗4周后,观察组患者血清NO含量较治疗前升高、ET含量较治疗前降低(P<0.05),观察组血清NO含量升高幅度、ET含量降低幅度大于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组治愈率为55.6%(20/36),高于对照组的22.2%(8/36,P<0.05)。两组均未出现严重不良反应。结论:浮针配合基础治疗可有效改善非急性期特发性面神经麻痹患者面肌运动功能,可能与调节血清NO、ET含量有关。
Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of Fu's subcutaneous needling in the treatment of non-acute idiopathic facial paralysis and its effect on serum levels of nitric oxide(NO) and endothelin(ET). Methods A total of 76 patients with non-acute idiopathic facial paralysis were randomly divided into an observation group(38 cases, 2 cases dropped out) and a control group(38 cases, 2 cases dropped out). The patients in the control group received basic treatment(mecobalamin tablets orally, specific electromagnetic spectrum irradiation, facial muscle rehabilitation training). The patients in the observation group were treated with Fu's subcutaneous needling on the basis of the control group. The needling points included brachioradialis muscle, sternocleidomastoid muscle, trapezius muscle, etc., and the needling was inserted around the affected muscle, and the reperfusion activity was carried out at the same time, once every other day, 3 times a week. Both groups were treated for 4 weeks. The House-Brackmann(H-B) grade and H-B symptom score were observed before treatment,after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment in the two groups. The facial disability index(FDI) score [including physical function(FDIP)score and social life function(FDIS) score] and the serum levels of NO and ET were compared before and after 4 weeks of treatment in the two groups. The clinical effect and safety of the two groups were assessed. Results After 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, the H-B grade of the two groups was lower than that before treatment, and the H-B symptom scores were higher than those before treatment(P<0.001, P<0.05); the H-B grade of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, and the H-B symptom score was higher than that of the control group(P<0.01, P<0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment,the FDIP scores of the two groups were higher than those before treatment, and the FDIS scores were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05); the FDIP score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, and the FDIS score was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the serum level of NO in the observation group was higher than that before treatment, and the serum level of ET was lower than that before treatment(P<0.05); the increase of serum level of NO and the decrease of serum level of ET in the observation group were greater than those in the control group(P<0.05). The cure rate of the observation group was 55.6%(20/36), which was higher than 22.2%(8/36) of the control group(P<0.05). There were no serious adverse reactions in both groups. Conclusion Fu's subcutaneous needling combined with basic treatment can effectively improve the motor function of facial muscles in patients with non-acute idiopathic facial paralysis, which may be related to the regulation of serum NO and ET levels.
[1]中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会神经肌肉病学组,中华医学会神经病学分会肌电图与临床神经电生理学组.中国特发性面神经麻痹诊治指南[J].中华神经科杂志,2016, 49(2):84-86.
[2] Patel M, Patel A, Zhou SJ. Bell palsy[J]. CMAJ, 2022, 194(25):E867.
[3] Zhang WJ, Xu L, Luo TT, et al. The etiology of Bell's palsy:a review[J]. J Neurol, 2020, 267(7):1896-1905.
[4]吕红,宋建新.贝尔面瘫患者血浆内皮素和一氧化氮含量的检测及临床意义[J].医学临床研究, 2008, 25(4):628-629.
[5]陈楚风,曹龙,刘美苹,等.浮针治疗周围性面瘫临床疗效的Meta分析[J].中医药导报, 2022, 28(11):174-178, 192.
[6]谢志红,李静,李康,等.浮针疗法在周围性面瘫治疗中的应用现状及分析[J].中国针灸, 2023, 43(5):607-610.
[7] Fang WJ, Sun J, Yang XL, et al. Fu's subcutaneous needling in treatment of acute Bell's palsy observed by laser speckle contrast imaging:a case report[J]. World J Acupunct-Moxibust, 2024,34(1):67-71.
[8]章小琴.浮针干预面神经炎急性期伴耳后疼痛的临床疗效观察[D].南昌:江西中医药大学, 2022.
[9]吴金建,汪花,刘佩慧,等.浮针配合面部主动再灌注活动治疗顽固性周围性面瘫的疗效观察[J].广州中医药大学学报,2019, 36(3):372-376.
[10]中国针灸学会.循证针灸临床实践指南贝尔面瘫(修订版):ZJ/T E002-2015[M].北京:中国中医药出版社, 2018.
[11]符仲华.浮针医学纲要:基于基础医学的现代针灸[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2016:119.
[12] House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1985, 93(2):146-147.
[13] VanSwearingen JM, Brach JS. The facial disability index:reliability and validity of a disability assessment instrument for disorders of the facial neuromuscular system[J]. Phys Ther, 1996,76(12):1288-1298; discussion 1298-1300.
[14]杨万章,吴芳,张敏.周围性面神经麻痹的中西医结合评定及疗效标准(草案)[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志, 2005, 3(9):786-787.
[15]符仲华,甘秀伦.气血新论:基于浮针医学的中西汇通[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2021:33.
[16]符仲华.再灌注和再灌注活动:关于外治法中边治疗边活动的方法[J].中国针灸, 2015, 35(S1):68-71.
[17]许明敏,黄辰,李瑛,等.周围性面瘫大鼠模型的研究现状与展望[J].中华中医药杂志, 2018, 33(12):5504-5507.
[18]袁辉,王仁贵,段永利,等.贝尔面瘫患者面神经管的MSCT研究[J].临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(8):1269-1272.
[19]陈炽祥.温针灸联合祛风解毒活络汤对周围性面瘫患者FDI、血清ET及NO水平的影响[J].上海针灸杂志, 2020, 39(3):310-314.
[20]郭飞,阮春鑫,马艳.针药结合治疗周围性面瘫后遗症期的疗效及对血浆内皮素影响的观察[J].浙江中医杂志, 2010, 45(11):791-792.
[21]阮春鑫,陈兴奎,林树梁.针刺配合中频分期治疗贝尔面瘫疗效及对血清一氧化氮含量的影响[J].上海针灸杂志, 2017,36(8):975-978.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240611-k0001
中图分类号:R246.6
引用信息:
[1]陶腊梅,李静,陆瑾等.浮针治疗非急性期特发性面神经麻痹:随机对照试验[J].中国针灸,2024,44(11):1249-1253.DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240611-k0001.
基金信息:
江苏省中医药管理局中医药科技发展计划面上项目:MS2021035; 南京市名中医工作室项目:LJ-2017-NJ;南京市名中医工作室基层工作站项目:LJ-2021-SJJCGZZ