nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 06, v.45 735-741
穴位埋线对青年痰湿质超重和肥胖的疗效观察
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金资助项目:82160933; 广西壮族自治区自然科学基金项目:2022GXNSFAA035577; 广西壮族自治区中医药管理局项目:GZZC2020052; 广西中医药大学“桂派中医药传承创新团队”资助项目:2022V005
邮箱(Email): zhaolh67@163.com;
DOI: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240610-k0004
摘要:

目的:观察穴位埋线治疗青年痰湿质超重和肥胖患者的临床疗效。方法:将66例青年痰湿质超重和肥胖患者随机分为观察组(33例,2例脱落、1例中止)和对照组(33例,3例脱落)。对照组予健康教育指导;观察组在对照组的基础上予穴位埋线治疗,穴取双侧天枢、大横、带脉、水道、滑肉门、丰隆和双侧肺俞、膈俞、胃脘下俞、脾俞、肾俞、大肠俞,两组穴位交替使用,每周1次。两组均治疗8周。分别于治疗前及治疗4、8周测量两组患者体质量、体脂率、腰围、臀围,并计算体质量指数(BMI);观察两组患者治疗前后痰湿质评分及心率变异性(HRV)相关指标[总功率(TP)、低频功率(LF)、高频功率(HF)、LF/HF、正常窦性RR间期总体标准差(SDNN)、正常相邻窦性RR间期差值均方根(RMSSD)、正常相邻RR间期差值>50 ms百分比(PNN50)],并比较两组患者临床疗效及体质改善率。治疗结束后6个月,随访临床疗效为有效的患者体质量,比较两组患者体质量回升率。结果:治疗4周,两组患者体质量、BMI、体脂率、腰围、臀围较治疗前降低(P<0.05);治疗8周,观察组患者体质量、BMI、体脂率、腰围、臀围较治疗前及治疗4周降低(P<0.05),对照组患者体质量较治疗前降低(P<0.05)。治疗8周,观察组患者体质量、BMI、腰围、臀围及痰湿质评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者体质量、BMI、体脂率、腰围、臀围的治疗前与治疗4周差值、治疗4周与治疗8周差值高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组患者TP、LF、HF、SDNN、RMSSD高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后观察组总有效率为90.0%(27/30),高于对照组的46.7%(14/30,P<0.05);痰湿质改善率为90.0%(27/30),高于对照组的50.0%(15/30,P<0.05)。治疗结束后6个月,观察组体质量回升率为37.0%(10/27),低于对照组的71.4%(10/14,P<0.05)。结论:穴位埋线能够有效改善青年痰湿质超重和肥胖患者的体质量、BMI、腰围、臀围及痰湿体质,调节自主神经紊乱,提高迷走神经活性,且具有一定远期疗效。

Abstract:

Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of acupoint thread-embedding for overweight and obese young adults with phlegm-dampness constitution. Methods A total of 66 young adults with overweight and obesity of phlegm-dampness constitution were randomly divided into an observation group(33 cases, 2 cases dropped out, 1 case was discontinued) and a control group(33 cases, 3 cases dropped out). Health education guidance was adopted in the control group. On the basis of the intervention in the control group, acupoint thread-embedding was applied in the observation group,two groups of acupoints were used alternately, i.e. bilateral Tianshu(ST25), Daheng(SP15), Daimai(GB26), Shuidao(ST28),Huaroumen(ST24), Fenglong(ST40) and bilateral Feishu(BL13), Geshu(BL17), Weiwanxiashu(EX-B3), Pishu(BL20),Shenshu(BL23), Dachangshu(BL25), once a week. Treatment of 8 weeks was required in the two groups. Before treatment,after 4 weeks and 8 weeks of treatment, the body weight, body fat rate, waist circumference and hip circumference were measured, and the body mass index(BMI) was calculated in the two groups; before and after treatment, the phlegm-dampness constitution score and the heart rate variability(HRV) related indexes(total power [TP], low frequency [LF], high frequency [HF], LF/HF, standard deviation of the normal to normal inter beat intervals [SDNN], root mean square of the successive differences [RMSSD], percentage of normal RR intervals with duration [PNN50]) were observed, and the clinical efficacy and constitution improvement rate were compared in the two groups. Six months after the treatment completion, the body weight of patients with effective clinical efficacy was observed, and the body weight rebound rate was compared in the two groups.Results After 4 weeks of treatment, the body weight, BMI, body fat rate, waist circumference and hip circumference were decreased compared with those before treatment in the two groups(P<0.05); after 8 weeks of treatment, the body weight,BMI, body fat rate, waist circumference and hip circumference were decreased compared with those before treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment in the observation group(P<0.05), and the body weight was decreased compared with that before treatment in the control group(P<0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, the body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference and phlegm-dampness constitution score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The differences in the body weight, BMI, body fat rate, waist circumference and hip circumference between before treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment, as well as after 4 weeks of treatment and after 8 weeks of treatment in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). After treatment, the TP, LF, HF, SDNN and RMSSD in the observation group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). After treatment, the total effective rate was 90.0%(27/30) in the observation group, which was higher than 46.7%(14/30) in the control group(P<0.05); the improvement rate of phlegm-dampness constitution was 90.0%(27/30) in the observation group, which was higher than 50.0%(15/30) in the control group(P<0.05). Six months after treatment completion, the weight rebound rate was 37.0%(10/27) in the observation group, which was lower than 71.4%(10/14) in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion Acupoint thread-embedding can effectively reduce the body weight, BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference and improve the phlegm-dampness constitution in overweight and obese young adults with phlegm-dampness constitution, regulate autonomic nerve disorders and improve vagus nerve activity, and has a certain long-term effect.

参考文献

[1] Risk Factor Collaboration(NCD-RisC)NCD. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from1975 to 2016:a pooled analysis of 2 416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10113):2627-2642.

[2]杨秋婷.经济学视角下关于人类肥胖现象的分析研究:文献综述[J].经济研究导刊, 2018(29):189-192.

[3]《中国居民营养与慢性病状况报告(2020年)》发布成年居民超重肥胖超50%[J].初中生世界, 2021(14):61.

[4] Wang YF, Zhao L, Gao LW, et al. Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol,2021, 9(7):446-461.

[5] World Health Organization. Global health risks:mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks[J]. World Health Organization, 2009.

[6]高月琴.肥胖与多种疾病密切相关[J].健康向导, 2023, 29(2):1.

[7] GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019:a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet,2020, 396(10258):1223-1249.

[8]梁繁荣,王华.针灸学[M]. 4版.北京:中国中医药出版社, 2016.

[9]李红,祝墡珠,饶克勤,等.肥胖症基层诊疗指南(实践版·2019)[J].中华全科医师杂志, 2020, 19(2):102-107.

[10]中华中医药学会.中医体质分类与判定(ZYYXH/T 157–2009)[J].世界中西医结合杂志, 2009, 4(4):303-304.

[11]张聪.中国营养学会发布《中国居民膳食指南(2022)》[J].食品安全导刊, 2022(14):4.

[12]中国医疗保健国际交流促进会营养与代谢管理分会,中国营养学会临床营养分会,中华医学会糖尿病学分会,等.中国超重/肥胖医学营养治疗指南(2021)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2021, 13(11):1-55.

[13]《针灸技术操作规范第部分:穴位埋线》项目组.中华人民共和国国家标准(GB/T 21709.10–2008)针灸技术操作规范第10部分穴位埋线[J].中国针灸, 2009, 29(5):405-406.

[14]危北海,贾葆鹏.单纯性肥胖病的诊断及疗效评定标准[J].中国中西医结合杂志, 1998, 18(5):317-319.

[15]贾葆峨.单纯性肥胖病的诊断、疗效评定标准及病历书写要求(第三次修订稿)[J].北京医学, 1993, 15(3):191-192.

[16]韩莉,王燕,邹大进.肥胖型2型糖尿病患者代谢手术后低碳水化合物饮食干预对体重反弹的影响[J].中华内分泌外科杂志, 2019, 13(3):191-194.

[17]国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准[M].南京:南京大学出版社, 1994:24.

[18]颜虹.医学统计学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2005:295-297.

[19]朱燕波,王琦,吴承玉,等. 18805例中国成年人中医体质类型与超重和肥胖关系的Logistic回归分析[J].中西医结合学报,2010, 8(11):1023-1028.

[20]王琦,董静,吴宏东,等.痰湿体质的分子生物学特征[J].中国工程科学, 2008, 10(7):100-103, 111.

[21]景彩,肖宁,张昕,等.基于16S rDNA测序技术研究痰湿质受试者肠道菌群的组成及丰度[J].中医杂志, 2019, 60(23):2045-2049.

[22]邓香茗.基于数据挖掘技术探索针灸治疗腹型肥胖腧穴优选与配伍规律研究[D].南宁:广西中医药大学, 2021.

[23]张景惠,赵汉青,王泽文,等.单纯性肥胖与中医脾胃理论应用[J].医学研究与教育, 2022, 39(3):54-59.

[24]周颖.背俞穴埋线治疗脾虚型单纯性肥胖的疗效研究[D].广州:广州中医药大学, 2018.

[25]伍先明.从瘦素介导下丘脑JAK2/STAT3通路探讨脂肪层穴位埋线干预单纯性肥胖的作用机制[D].贵阳:贵州中医药大学,2020.

[26]李博,周聪,杨泽武,等.穴位埋线对腹型肥胖患者高尿酸血症的影响[J].深圳中西医结合杂志, 2021, 31(4):66-67.

[27]钱虹宇,颉媛媛,许婧.基于脑肠菌轴研究电针与穴位埋线对食源性肥胖大鼠肠道菌群及脑肠肽的影响[J].成都中医药大学学报, 2023, 46(4):22-31.

[28]陈宜恬,陈泽莉,冯祯根,等.基于“脏腑别通”理论的穴位埋线法治疗肥胖型高脂血症疗效观察[J].中华全科医学, 2019,17(12):2092-2095.

[29]董正妮,尹丽丽.穴位埋线治疗肥胖伴胰岛素抵抗患者的效果[J].广东医学, 2018, 39(16):2535-2537.

[30]姚如婕,谢雪榕.不同穴位埋线周期治疗单纯性肥胖的临床疗效观察[J].岭南急诊医学杂志, 2017, 22(1):59-61.

[31]徐斌,刘志诚,张中成.针刺治疗肥胖临床方案制定的基本思路和方法[J].中国针灸, 2004, 24(2):57-61.

[32] Giannakakis G, Marias K, Tsiknakis M. A stress recognition system using HRV parameters and machine learning techniques[C]//2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos(ACIIW). Cambridge, United Kingdom. IEEE, 2019:269-272.

[33]魏生宝.心率变异性的研究进展[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2018, 6(11):6, 8.

[34]许君.学龄期肥胖儿童胰岛素抵抗的发生情况及其与自主神经功能的相关性研究[J].中华全科医学, 2022, 20(3):438-440.

[35]邓洁琳,余锂镭,江洪.肥胖相关的神经免疫研究进展[J].医学综述, 2018, 24(23):4615-4619.

[36]古强.不同运动方式对单纯性肥胖患者自主神经功能影响的对比研究[J].内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 2017,46(4):616-620.

[37] Wu J, Pierart C, Chaplin TM, et al. Getting to the heart of food craving with resting heart rate variability in adolescents[J].Appetite, 2020, 155:104816.

[38]徐飞,徐菁,谢浩.体力活动水平和心肺耐力对肥胖者心率变异性的影响:一项横断面研究[J].中国运动医学杂志, 2019,38(3):187-193.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240610-k0004

中图分类号:R246.1

引用信息:

[1]马玉霞,赵利华,黄新格等.穴位埋线对青年痰湿质超重和肥胖的疗效观察[J].中国针灸,2025,45(06):735-741.DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240610-k0004.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金资助项目:82160933; 广西壮族自治区自然科学基金项目:2022GXNSFAA035577; 广西壮族自治区中医药管理局项目:GZZC2020052; 广西中医药大学“桂派中医药传承创新团队”资助项目:2022V005

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文